S.M.KANTIKAR
Mulkh Raj – Appellant
Versus
Jaipur Golden Hospital – Respondent
1. Complaint:
The OPs have filed their written version and denied entire allegations. It is submitted that the patient was suffering from moderate to severe Chronic Kidney Failure since December, 2004. Thereafter, for two years, he did not consult the OP-2. On 1.12.2006, he was admitted in OP-1/hospital with ESRD and after dialysis, he was told the requirement of transplant, if he could arrange the donor. The patient arranged his wife as a kidney donor. After proper evaluation of patient and the donor from Dr. Lal Path Lab, RT was performed at OP-1 on 26.12.2006, by the qualified team of doctors viz. Dr. Nautiyal, (OP-2), Dr. Saxena (OP-3). During entire hospitalization period, care of patient was proper as per the standard norms. The patient was put on triple drug immune-suppression including injection Zenapax and the graft produced good amount of urine during day 0/1/2 post-operatively. Thereafter, the urine output was 1.5 litre for few days. The USG and Doppler study were conducted on 29.12.2006 by qualified Radiologists, OP-4 and OP-5. However, rising values of Blood Urea and Creatinine, after dialysis; first graft biopsy was done on 30.12.2006, it did not show adequate
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.