SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

D.K.JAIN, M.SHREESHA
Ravikant G. Salaskar – Appellant
Versus
Kirit Shah – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Shree Prakash Sinha, Advocate

ORDER

This Appeal, by the judgement debtor, a real estate developer, purportedly under Section 27A of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”), is directed against the orders dated 9.3.2018 and 15.3.2018, passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Maharashtra at Mumbai (for short “the State Commission”), in Execution Application No. EA/17/107. By the first order, the State Commission had directed issue of non-bailable warrants against the Appellant as on that date, despite service of notice in the Execution Application, filed by the Complainant/decree-holder, he as well as his counsel failed to appear and the Counsel appearing for him did not have the authority letter to represent him. By the latter order, the State Commission has dismissed the Application filed by the Appellant, praying for cancellation of the non-bailable warrants directed to be issued against him vide order dated 9.3.2018, observing thus:

“Heard on the application filed for cancellation of Non-bailable warrant which is strongly objected on behalf of executants/complainants on the ground that opponent/accused had jumped the bail and did not comply with the final order. Unless opp







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top