V.K.JAIN
Nitishree Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (now known as Shourya Towers Pvt. Ltd. ) – Appellant
Versus
Kapil Jindal – Respondent
V.K. Jain, Presiding Member—The complainant/respondent was allotted a residential flat by the appellant in a project, namely, ‘Shourya Greens’, which the appellant was to develop in Jalandhar. The allotment was made for a total consideration of Rs.3443000/- and a sum of Rs.3021760/- stands already paid by the complainant. The possession of the flat was to be delivered by December, 2012 though there was a grace period of three months available to the builder. Since the possession of the flat was not delivered to him, the complainant approached the concerned State Commission by way of a consumer complaint seeking refund of the amount paid by him along with compensation etc.
2. The complaint was resisted by the appellant which took a preliminary objection that Novena Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd. was a necessary and proper party to the complaint, in view of the contract dated 12.1.2010 executed between the appellant and Novena Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd. The State Commission, however, did not go into the question as to whether Novena Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd. was a necessary party to the complaint or not though it upheld the liability of the appellant towards t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.