SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

B.C.GUPTA, S.M.KANTIKAR
Birla Sun Life Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Gudela Siva – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Mr. Tadimalla Baskar Gowtham, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Rakesh K. Rajwania, Advocate

ORDER

Dr. S.M. Kantikar, Member—These two instant appeals have been filed under Section 19 read with Section 21(a)(ii) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the impugned order dated 23.09.2014 passed in Consumer Complaint No. 21 of 2013 by the Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Hyderabad (in short, ‘the State Commission’) whereby the State Commission allowed the complaint and directed the opposite parties to pay an amount of Rs.50,00,000/- to the complainant together with interest @ 7% per annum from the date of complaint till the date of realization.

2. The relevant facts for the disposal of both the appeals are that Gudela Durgamma, the life assured took an insurance policy in ‘Platinum 3’ plus Plan of the OP (Birla Sun Life Insurance Co. Ltd.) for a period of 3 years on an annual premium of Rs.10 lakh, with sum assured of Rs.50 lakhs to be paid to the nominee (Gudela Siva, the complainant) after her death. Before issuing the policy, the OP conducted several medical tests upon the life assured. During the currency of policy on 30.03.2011, the li































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top