SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

AJIT BHARIHOKE
Baba Estates and Colonizers – Appellant
Versus
Vishal Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Advocate

ORDER

This appeal is directed against the order of the State Commission, Punjab dated 30.10.2017 in CC/377/2016.

2. Briefly put, facts relevant for the disposal of the appeal are that the respondent filed consumer complaint in the State Commission alleging that vide allotment letter dated 13.2.2015 he was allotted flat No.137 (2nd Floor) having super area 1050 sq. ft. in the development project “Shivjot Apartment” undertaken by the opposite party. As per the terms and conditions of allotment total consideration payable was Rs.23 lakhs to paid in instalments as per payment plan on demand of instalment due by the opposite party. The opposite party had agreed to deliver possession of the subject flat to the complainant on or before May, 2015. It is the case of the complainant that he had been paying instalments regularly and in all he had paid a sum of Rs.21,05,114/- in instalments against the agreed consideration. The said payments were paid by availing housing loan of Rs.18,40,000/- from HDFC Bank @10.15% per annum on variable rate basis. It is alleged that despite having received























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top