Challenge in this Revision Petition, under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act’), by the Complainant, is to the order dated 23.12.2014 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Maharashtra Circuit Bench at Nagpur (for short “the State Commission”) in First Appeal No.795 of 2009. By the impugned order, the State Commission has overturned the order dated 28.10.2009, passed by the Additional District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Nagpur (for short “the District Forum”) in Complaint No.78 of 2009 and has dismissed the Complaint filed by the Petitioner.

2. In the first instance, while allowing the Complaint filed by the Petitioner, alleging deficiency in service on the part of the Respondent, namely, L&T Finance Limited (for short “the Finance Company”), the sole Opposite Party in the Complaint, in repossessing and auctioning the Tractor to the Petitioner, for which the Finance Company had granted financial assistance to the Petitioner for a total sum of Rs.3,20,000/-, under the ‘Kisan Gaurav Scheme’, for purchase of the Tractor, costing to Rs.5,10,000/-, without following due process of law, the District Forum had dir