B.C.GUPTA, S.M.KANTIKAR
Yadram – Appellant
Versus
Satish Chaturvedi – Respondent
Dr. S. M. Kantikar, Member—This revision petition has been filed under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 for the enhancement of compensation against the order dated 29.06.2005, passed by the Rajasthan State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jaipur (for short, “the State Commission”) wherein the appeal No. 2195 of 2004, filed by the petitioner/complainant, was dismissed.
2. The brief facts are that the complainant’s young energetic son (for short ‘patient’) had suffered fever on 14-04-2003 and at 7.30 p.m. on that day, he was taken to the clinic of Dr. Satish Chaturvedi, the OP. The OP, without examining the patient, administered two injections and a bottle of glucose. Immediately after that, red patches appeared on the whole body of the patient, which later turned into boils. The patient was sent back to his house by the OP. On the same day, at about 09:30 P.M., the condition of the patient further deteriorated and the complainant took his son to the clinic of OP, but it was closed. He made telephonic call from the nearby Shipra Medical Store and apprised the OP about the condition of the patient. The OP asked the sale person in the medical store to hand
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.