SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PREM NARAIN
B. L. Malviya – Appellant
Versus
A. Zohari – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner: in person
For the Respondent:Mr. Chandrachur Bhattacharyya, Advocate

ORDER

Prem Narain, Presiding Member—This revision petition has been filed by the petitioner B.L. Malviya against the order dated 28.02.2013 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Madhya Pradesh, (in short ‘the State Commission’) passed in Appeal No.1532 of 2012.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner/complainant deposited a cheque by dropping the cheque in the drop box on 21.05.2009. On 22.05.2009, the petitioner presented an application before the bank that his cheque be returned to him as he has not entered his name in the cheque against the payee. Though the bank in writing also assured that they will return the cheque, however, the same was not returned and the cheque expired on 30.05.2009. Ultimately, when the cheque was not returned before the expiry of the cheque the complainant filed a consumer complaint before the District Forum. The complaint was resisted by the respondent/opposite party on the ground that the issuer of the cheque Mr. Amit Rathore sent ‘stop payment request’ to the bank and also stated that the cheque was issued in the year 2005 and was not issued in favour of the complainant. The bank asserted that the cheque was presented by chan











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top