SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

AJIT BHARIHOKE
Sameer Dewan – Appellant
Versus
Unitech Limited – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Ms. Himanshi Singh, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:Mr. Babanjeet Singh, Advocate

ORDER

Ajit Bharihoke, Presiding Member—The opposite party was allotted land by Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority for developing Group Housing Complex, namely, Unitech Horizon’ in Plot No.6, Sector Pi-2, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh.

2. The complainant who was in search of house, came to know about the above project of the opposite party. However, the booking and allotment in the said project was already over. As the complainant was desirous to purchase the house in the said project, he approached the desk office of the opposite party. The opposite party introduced him to different brokers and brokers showed the complainant, the houses for sale by the original allottees. The complainant chose apartment no. 0403 Tower 22 on 4th floor and was introduced to the original allottees, namely, Ranjiv Jaggi & Ms. Geetika Jaggi of subject apartment.

3. It is further the case of the complainant that opposite party assured that the construction is in full swing and the houses will be ready within the stipulated time i.e. 15.11.2008. After being satisfied with the promises of the opposite party, the complainant decided to purchase the subject apartment from the original allottee. The


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top