SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

M.SHREESHA
Magma Fincorp Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Naziya Parvin – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Sahej Uban, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. B.K. Upadhyay, Advocate

ORDER

M. Shreesha, Presiding Member—Challenge in this Revision Petition, under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, is to the order dated 10.07.2017, passed by the Uttar Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at Lucknow (for short “the State Commission”) in Appeal No. 488 of 2014. Vide the impugned order, the State Commission has allowed the Appeal in part; set aside the order dated 22.01.2014, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Sitapur (for short “the District Forum”) in Complaint Case No. 116 of 2009; and directed Magma Fincorp Ltd. (for short “the Finance Company”), the Revision Petitioner herein, to pay to the Appellant/Complainant a sum of Rs.1,53,952/-, with interest @ 9% p.a. on the said amount from the date of filing of the Complaint till payment. In the first instance, the District Forum had dismissed the Complaint, preferred by the Complainant.

2. Briefly put, the facts material to the case are that the Complainant, owner of Marshal Maxx vehicle, took a loan of Rs.3,75,000/- from the Finance Company. He repaid a total sum of Rs.2,34,000/- on different occasions, up-to 30.06.2009. It was averred that the subject vehicle was

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top