Challenge in this Revision Petition, under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”), by an Airlines, namely, Spice Jet Limited, the sole Opposite Party in the Complaint, is to the order dated 30.10.2017 passed by the Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at New Delhi (for short “the State Commission”) in First Appeal No.370 of 2016. By the impugned order, the State Commission has dismissed the Appeal preferred by the Petitioner against the order dated 27.01.2016, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, North-East Government of NCT of Delhi (for short ‘the District Forum”) in Complaint Case No.485 of 2014, in default as it had remained unrepresented on two dates, viz. 24.07.2017 and 30.10.2017 when the Appeal was taken up for consideration.

2. Upon notice, the Complainant is present in person. Accordingly, we have heard learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the Respondent.

3. Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that the sole cause for non-appearance of the Counsel, duly engaged by the Petitioner, before the State Commission was on account of wrong recording of the date of hearing in the dia