SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PREM NARAIN
Sushila Kumari – Appellant
Versus
LIC of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Sanchar Anand, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Rajesh K. Gupta, Advocate

ORDER

This revision petition has been filed by the petitioner Sushila Kumari against the order dated 30.05.2011 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana (in short ‘the State Commission’) passed in First Appeal No.376 of 2008.

2. Brief facts of the case are that on 24.04.2003 , Ram Niwas, late husband of the revisionist obtained life insurance policy No.173485821 and policy No.173485822 for a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- and Rs.50,000/- respectively from the respondent. On 28.07.2003, Ram Niwas, late husband of revisionist obtained life insurance policy No.173489970 for a sum of Rs.50,000/- from the respondent. On 03.02.2004, Ram Niwas, the insured expired due to sudden heart attack. On 17.03.2005, since inspite of the revisionist submitting all claim documents and completing all formalities, the respondent failed to make payment of the insurance policy to the complainant. Therefore, the present revisionist filed the complaint No.92 of 2005 against the respondent before District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Hisar (in short ‘the District Forum’). The District Forum passed the following order vide its order dated 14.12.2007:-

“7. So in view of the abovesaid discussi



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top