D.K.JAIN, M.SHREESHA
Keer Hotels Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
TATA A. I. G. General Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent
M. Shreesha, Member—Challenge in this Revision Petition under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”), is to the order dated 09.06.2015, in First Appeal No.15/2, passed by the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mumbai (for short “the State Commission”). By the impugned order, the State Commission has concurred with the finding of the District Forum that the repudiation of the claim of the Petitioner by the Insurance
2. Company was justified as the Insured had violated the terms and conditions of the policy by not taking reasonable care of the vehicle in question.
3. For the sake of convenience, the Petitioner hereinafter is referred to as the ‘Complainant’ and the Respondent as the ‘Insurance Company’.
4. The facts material to the case are that the Complainant M/s Keer Hotels Private Limited had taken an Auto Secure Policy for the period 02.03.2013 to 01.03.2014, for its Innova vehicle for an insured amount of Rs.3,58,789/-. On 01.05.2013, around 5:45 a.m., the driver of the Complainant Mr. Sunder Mutuswamy, went to drop a client of the Hotel at the airport and on the way back he had left the vehicle at Vile Parle, with
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.