DEEPA SHARMA
Subrata Kumar Kundu – Appellant
Versus
Esenel Construction Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
The above said appeals have been filed by both the parties i.e. the appellant – Subrata Kumar and the respondent – Esenel Construction against the order of the State Commission dated 24.03.2011 passed by West Bengal State Commission (in short, the State Commission), whereby the complaint of the appellant in Appeal No. 224 of 2011 was partly allowed and following order was passed:
“Hence it is ordered that the petition of complaint stands allowed in part on contest against the OPs with cost of Rs.10,00/0/- (rupees ten thousand only). The OPs are jointly and severally liable to refund Rs.6,00,000/- (rupees six lakhs only) to the complainant with accrued simple interest @ 10% (ten per cent) per annum from the date of receipt of the same till payment. The OPs are further directed to pay Rs.5,00,000 (rupees five lakhs only) to the complainant by way of compensation. The OPs are jointly and severally liable to pay the above decretal amount to the complainant within 45 (forty five) days from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment, failing which the aforesaid amount will carry interest @ 9% (nine percent) per annum from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment till realizat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.