V.K.JAIN
Vishal Patil – Appellant
Versus
Anand Properties – Respondent
V.K. Jain, Presiding Member—The appellants/complainants booked residential flats with the respondent Anand Properties in a project which the respondent was to develop on land comprising Survey No.85 (part) of Sub-Division & Taluka Mulshi within the limits of Zilla Parishad, Pune and different flats in the proposed project were allotted to them. They also executed agreements with the respondent incorporating their respective obligations in respect of the said purchase. The possession as per the agreements was to be delivered by June 2014, which can be said to mean by 30.06.2014. The case of the appellants, as set out in the amended complaint, is that the aforesaid flats were booked through Jain Sangh, Pune. Since the possession of the flats was not delivered to them within the time stipulated in the agreements and amenities which the respondent was to provide in the said project, were allegedly not provided, they approached the concerned State Commission by way of separate Consumer Complaints. There was also dispute between the parties as regards the payment of Service Tax and Value Added Tax. The State Commission decided the said complaint vide order dated 26.04.2016 wi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.