ANUP K.THAKUR, C.VISWANATH
TATA AIG General Insurance Company Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Ring Road Honda – Respondent
C. Viswanath, Member—The present Revision Petition is filed by the Petitioner under Section21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the order passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “State Commission”) in R.P. No. 970/2006 dated 10.02.2009.
2. In this Case, Respondent No.2/Complainant had obtained Insurance Policy No. 0100197084 for his Honda City Car DL 4C AB 08995 for the period 28.02.2004 to 27.02.2005. On 19.09.2004, while returning to hotel at Sawai Madhopur alongwith his family at about 11PM, the car hit a speed breaker with a loud thud, resulting in extensive damages. According to the Complainant, information about the accident was given to the Petitioner under whose advice the car was handed over for repair to Respondent No.1. Thereafter, the Petitioner arranged survey of the car at the workshop of Respondent No.1. Respondent No. 2 provided the estimate of repair, and other documents to the Petitioner. During the course of survey, Respondent No.1 gave the impression that the entire claim shall be borne by the insurance company, as the vehicle was only 3 months old. In the last week of October, 2004, Res
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.