SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ANUP K.THAKUR, C.VISWANATH
HDFC Bank (Card Division) – Appellant
Versus
Somesh Chandra Sharma – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Joydip Bhattacharya, Advocate
For the Respondent: NEMO

ORDER

C. Viswanath, J.—The present Revision Petition is filed by the Petitioner under Section21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against Order passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, West Bengal (hereinafter referred to as the “State Commission”) in F.A. No. 633/2013 dated 29.01.2015.

2. It is the case of the Respondent/Complainant that he had secured a personal loan of Rs.58,443.11/- against Credit Card bearing No. 43467710 0126 3897 and repayment of the said amount was being made directly to the Petitioners/Opposite Party through Savings Bank Account No. 01062000004378.When the outstanding amount of loan grew higher, the Petitioners agreed with the Respondent for one time settlement of loan at Rs.19,500/-, on the condition that Rs.2840/- was to be repaid by cash on 27.06.2008; Rs.5554/- on 23.07.2008, Rs.5553/- on 22.08.2008 and Rs.5553/- on 22.09.2008 by post dated cheques, vide Petitioner’s Bank letter No. S 0237747 dated 27.06.2008. After the said settlement, the Respondent tendered post-dated cheques bearing No. 631901 dated 22.07.2008 for Rs.
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top