SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

V.K.JAIN
Vineet Kumar – Appellant
Versus
DLF Universal Limited – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
In FA No.1340 of 2016
For the Appellants:Mr. Sudhir K. Makkar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manav Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate Ms. Seema Sundd, Ms. Kanika Agnihotri, Mr. Saurabh Kumar and Ms. Shreyansi Goel, Advocates
In All Other First Appeals
For the Appellants:Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate Ms. Seema Sundd, Ms. Kanika Agnihotri, Mr. Saurabh Kumar and Ms. Shreyansi Goel, Advocates
For the Respondents:Mr. Sudhir K. Makkar, Sr. Advocate Mr. Sandeep Bhardwaj, Mr. Anant Agarwal, Mr. Natansh Kr. Pal, for ICICI Bank, Mr. Savinder Singh Gill, Mr. Manav Kumar, Mr. Parvez Chugh, In person with Mr. Nikhil Jain, Mr. Amarjeet Singh, Mr. Narender Yadav, Mr. Lakhbir Singh, Mr. Anand V. Khatri, Ms. Surbhi and Mr. Chinmay Sejwal, Advocates

ORDER

V.K. Jain, Presiding Member—These are 19 appeals, arising out of the different orders passed by the State Commission, UT Chandigarh. 18 appeals having been filed by DLF Universal Limited and one appeal has been filed by one of the allottees namely Vineet Kumar & Anr., 18 complaints were instituted before the State Commission, by the alllottees of residential floors in a project namely ‘Hyde Park Terraces’, which DLF Limited was to develop in New Chandigarh, Mullanpur. Admittedly, as per the schedule agreed between the parties, the possession of the residential floors was to be delivered within thirty months from the date of application. Except in one case, i.e. the complaint subject matter of the FA/1328/2016 filed by Vineet Kumar, where the consumer complaint was instituted by Vineet Kumar, there was delay in offering possession of the allotted residential floors to the concerned allottees. Being aggrieved, they approached the concerned State commission by way of separate consumer complaints. In 17 consumer complaints, the allottees sought refund of the amount paid by them to the developer, along with compensation etc. whereas in one case, i.e. the complaint subject matter





























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top