SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

V.K.JAIN
Ahaar Feeds – Appellant
Versus
Future Generali India Insurance Company – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Rakesh Kumar and Mr. R.K. Kohli, Advocates
For the Respondent:Mr. Navneet Kumar and Mr. Vikas Bhadana, Advocates

ORDER (ORAL)

V.K. Jain, Presiding Member—The complainant/petitioner hired a vehicle bearing registration no. MH-15-CK-412, for transporting eggs. On 15.07.2014, when the said truck with eggs loaded on it, reached near Village Dasia, a blue-bull came in front of the truck carrying eggs. The driver tried to avoid hitting the animal and in the process, the vehicle over turned, thereby damaging eggs worth Rs.4,97,310/-. Since the said goods had been insured by the petitioner with the respondent, a claim for re-imbursement in terms of the said insurance policy was lodged. The claim however, was repudiated vide e-mail dated 11.08.2014 which, to the extent it is relevant, reads as under:—

“We received surveyor report in this claim. We found overloading in this subject loaded consignment vehicle.

Policy is having condition in for overloading which is read as “It is a condition of policy that weight of cargo should not exceed registered capacity of vehicle.”

In Kg.

 

Gross vehicle weight

11900

Unladen Weight

4790

Loading capacity

71











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top