SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

V.K.JAIN
Laxmiprasad Anant Desai – Appellant
Versus
Suresh P. Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Anand Patwardhan, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Pradeep Kumar Mathur, Advocate (Caveator)

ORDER (ORAL)

V.K. Jain, Presiding Member—The complainant / respondent booked a residential flat with the petitioner in a building namely ‘Kohinoor Enclave’, which the petitioner was to construct in Sector 18 on plot No.10 in Kamothe. The sale consideration for the said flat was agreed to Rs.17,88,500/-. The flat No.702 in the aforesaid project was allotted to the complainant. The following was the payment plan agreed between the parties as is evident from the agreement dated 12.2.2014:

Earnest Money deposit on booking

30%

On commencement of Plinth

20%

On Casting of 1st slab

12%

On casting of 2nd slab

10%

On casting of 3rd slab

10%

On casting of 4th slab

02%

On casting of 5th slab

02%

On casting of 6th slab

02%

On casting of 7th slab

02%

On casting of 8th slab

02%

On brick masonry / plastering

02%

On plumbing and sanitary

02%

On painting and electric work

02%

On possession

02%

2. The complainant has made a total






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top