SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

R.K.AGRAWAL, M.SHREESHA
Shikha – Appellant
Versus
JTPL Townships Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Mr. S.K. Bawa, Advocate
For the Respondent for JTPL Townships:Mr. K.K. Jha, Advocate
For the Dewan Housing Corp.: Ms. Prarthana Sampath, A/R

ORDER

M. Shreesha, Member—Aggrieved by the order dated 08.02.2018 in Consumer Complaint No.274 of 2016, passed by the Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chandigarh (in short “the State Commission”), the Complainant and the first Opposite Party namely, M/s JTPL Township Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “the Developer”) preferred First Appeal Nos. 557 of 2018 and 602 of 2017 respectively, under Section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short “the Act”). By the impugned order, the State Commission has allowed the Complaint in part directing the Developer to pay the following amounts:—

1. Pay Rs.26,89,000/- + Rs.19,742/- + Rs.24,132/- = Rs. 27,32,834/- to the Complainant alongwith interest @ 12% p.a. from the various dates of payment minus the pre-EMIs interest paid by OP No. 1 to OP No.2. It is further observed that first payment due to OP No. 2 will be cleared first and then to the Complainant.

2. OP No. 1 is further directed to pay Rs.1,00,000/- as compensation for mental harassment and inconvenience suffered by the Complainant.

3. Pay Rs.21,00






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top