SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ANUP K.THAKUR, C.VISWANATH
SS ONN THE GO, Unit of M/s. Eatbud Food Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Mridul Jain – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Ms. Swati Gupta, Advocate

ORDER

C. Viswanath, Member—The present Revision Petition is filed by the Petitioner under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against Order passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “State Commission”) in Appeal No. 540/2017 dated 07.05.2018.

2. In the Complaint, the Respondent/Complainant stated that on 24.06.2015, he purchased food items from the Petitioner against the card issued by My Square, Versatile Food Courts Pvt. Ltd. The Complainant further stated that he was surprised to see that the Petitioner charged Rs.50/- for one Pepsi Can, whereas MRP on the can was Rs.27/-. He informed about the same to the officials of My Square, Versatile Food Courts Pvt. Ltd. and the Petitioner and requested to refund the excess amount received, but they flatly refused saying that they have charged the amount as per the policy of their company. Further, the Respondent requested the officials to provide the Complaint book. They refused to provide the same saying that they do not have any such book. Legal notice dated 20.07.2015 was issued by the Respondent which was replied by the Opposite Parties on the basis of false averm
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top