S.M.KANTIKAR, DINESH SINGH
Siddhnath Hospital – Appellant
Versus
Kaushal Kumar Maurya – Respondent
Dinesh Singh, Member—Learned counsel for the revision petitioners (the hospital and the doctors) was heard. The material on record was perused.
2. On 25.03.2019, after hearing arguments of the learned counsel for the revision petitioners (the hospital and the doctors), and after perusing the material on record, we passed the following Order:—
Dated: 25.03.2019
Order
Heard learned counsel for the revision petitioners.
Perused the material on record.
The revision petition is dismissed with cost of Rs. 50,000/- to be paid by the revision petitioners to the respondent – complainant within four weeks of the pronouncement of the reasoned judgment.
Reasoned judgment to follow. We are giving our reasons hereinafter.
3. The dispute relates to amendment by the complainant in his complaint of alleged medical negligence filed by him before the District Forum.
4. Briefly, the complainant filed a complaint (c.c. no. 18 / 2018) in the District Forum on 19.03.2018 alleging medical negligence on the part of the opposite parties (the hospital and the doctors), which resulted in the death of his pregnant wife and child.
5. The District Forum vide its Order dated 07.09.2018 allowed his applicati
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.