SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.M.KANTIKAR, DINESH SINGH
Siddhnath Hospital – Appellant
Versus
Kaushal Kumar Maurya – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Pawan Kumar Ray, Advocate

ORDER

Dinesh Singh, Member—Learned counsel for the revision petitioners (the hospital and the doctors) was heard. The material on record was perused.

2. On 25.03.2019, after hearing arguments of the learned counsel for the revision petitioners (the hospital and the doctors), and after perusing the material on record, we passed the following Order:—

Dated: 25.03.2019

Order

Heard learned counsel for the revision petitioners.

Perused the material on record.

The revision petition is dismissed with cost of Rs. 50,000/- to be paid by the revision petitioners to the respondent – complainant within four weeks of the pronouncement of the reasoned judgment.

Reasoned judgment to follow. We are giving our reasons hereinafter.

3. The dispute relates to amendment by the complainant in his complaint of alleged medical negligence filed by him before the District Forum.

4. Briefly, the complainant filed a complaint (c.c. no. 18 / 2018) in the District Forum on 19.03.2018 alleging medical negligence on the part of the opposite parties (the hospital and the doctors), which resulted in the death of his pregnant wife and child.

5. The District Forum vide its Order dated 07.09.2018 allowed his applicati

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top