SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DEEPA SHARMA, C.VISWANATH
ELDECO Infrastructure & Properties Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Mukesh Kumar – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Mr. Ujjwal K Jha and Mr. H K Jaggi, Advocates

ORDER

IA / 7848 / 2019 (preponement of date of hearing)

Case is taken up on this application, requesting that on the previous date i.e. 29.04.2019, the Bench was on leave and the Court Master has given the date of 07.01.2020 for admission of the matter. It is requested that matter be heard. Accordingly, application is allowed and matter is heard.

IA / 6443 / 2019 (condonation of delay)

(Oral)

Arguments are heard on the application for condonation of delay. This application is filed along with the appeal for condonation of delay in filing it. In the application, number of days by which the present appeal is delayed, is not mentioned. The Registry has reported that delay is of about 183 days. It is submitted that delay has occurred as the appellant was negotiating with the respondent offering possession of the alternate flat to the respondent and in that context had also written a letter dated 23.10.2018. The appellant received the contempt notice dated 05.11.2018 on 10.11.2018. The appellants also issued another notice for alternate unit on 24.11.2018. The respondent, however, was negotiating with them on one hand and on the other hand, he filed the execution petition. The appellant








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top