S.M.KANTIKAR, DINESH SINGH
Country Colonisers Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Harmit Singh Arora – Respondent
Counsel for the Parties:
FA/542/2017
For the Appellant:Mr. Sumeer Sodhi, Mr. Arjun Nanda and Ms. Ridhima Juneja, Advocates
For the Respondents:Mr. Sumeet Anand, Advocate with Mr. Pratyush Parmial, Mr. Ankur Gogia and Mr. Shivam Sharma, Advocates
For the Respondent No.1 in person
For the Respondents Nos.2 and 3: deleted
FA/1198/2017
For the Respondents:Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate
FA/1292/2017
For the Respondents:Mr. Yadvinder Singh Bhatia, (Respondent No.1 in person)
FA/1387/2017
For the Respondents:Mr. Manav Bajaj, Advocate with Respondent in person
FA/1402/2017
For the Respondents:Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate
FA/1679/2017
For the Respondents:Mr. Munish Goel, Advocate
FA/1948/2017
For the Respondents:Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate
FA/1954/2017
For the Respondents: NEMO
FA/2319/2018
For the Respondents:Mr. Parminder Pal Singh Bhatia (Respondent in person)
For the Respondent No.3:Mr. Krishan Kumar, Advocate with Mr. Rahul Raj Mishra, Advocate
FA/26/2018
For the Respondents:Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate
FA/27/2018
For the Respondents:Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate
For the Respondent No.3:Mr. Avnish Tyagi, Advocate
FA/1138/2018
For the Respondents:Mr. Pushpinder Singh, Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Jain and Mr. Prabjit Singh, Advocates
FA/1142/2018
For the Respondents:Mr. Pushpinder Singh, Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Jain and Mr. Prabjit Singh, Advocates
FA/1376/2018
For the Respondents:Mr. Arvind Rathaur, Advocate with Mr. Shashi Ranjan, Advocate
FA/1510/2018
For the Respondents:Mr. Nikhil Jain, Advocate
FA/1615/2018
For the Respondent No.1:Mr. Rajnish Ranjan, Advocate for Mr. Shashwat V. Dubey, Advocate
For the Respondent No.2:Mr. Pradeep Kumar Jha, Advocate
FA/1620/2018
For the Respondents:Mr. Savinder Singh Gill, Advocate with Mr. Anant Agarwal, Advocate
FA/1862/2018
For the Respondent No.1:Mr. Karan Dewan, Advocate
For the Respondent No.2:Mr. Pradeep Kumar Jha, Advocate
FA/1953/2018
For the Respondents:Mr. Savinder Singh Gill, Advocate with Mr. Anant Agarwal, Advocate
FA/119/2019
For the Respondent Nos.1 and 2:Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate with Mr. Chitvan Singhal, Advocate
For the Respondent No.3:Mr. Pradeep Kumar Jha, Advocate
ORDER
Dinesh Singh, Member—This relates to a home buyer - builder co. dispute.
2. On 03.06.2019, after hearing the learned counsel present and the complainants present in person, and after perusing the material on record, and after the due consideration, we recorded the sum and substance of our considered view in the daily Order:—
Dated: 03-06-2019
Order
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant – builder co. and the learned counsel for the respondents – complainants and the respondents - complainants in - person.
Perused the material on record.
Deficiency in service and unfair trade practice are determined against the appellant – builder co.
The respective principal amount / s deposited by the respondent / s – complainant / s with the appellant – builder co. shall be refunded with interest by the appellant – builder co. to the respondent / s – complainant / s in each case.
The interest shall be payable from the respective date / s of deposit to the actual date / s of realisation.
The rate of interest shall be the rate for house building loan in the correspondi
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
Back
