ORDER

Dinesh Singh, Member—The substantive question in consumer complaints no. 319 of 2011 and no. 320 of 2011 is whether or not the complainants are entitled to due lawful possession and registration of the respective subject flats.

2. C.C. No. 319 of 2011 and C.C. No. 320 of 2011 have been allowed in favour of the complainants by the State Commission vide its common Order dated 16.02.2016:—

Order

a. The complaint nos. CC/11/319 & CC/11/320 are hereby allowed.

b. The opponents are directed to execute Sale Deed in respect of the flats in the name of the complainants after accepting the remaining amount of consideration and hand over the peaceful possession to the complainants.

c. The opponents are directed to pay compensation of Rs. 1,00,000/- in each complaint to the complainants for mental agony and harassment.

d. The parties to bear their own costs.

(extract from the State Commission’s common Order dated 16.02.2016)

3. The parties in the two c.c.s are as below:—

Mrs. Madhavi Gautam Nahar – complainant in c.c. no. 319 of 2011

Mrs. Pallavi Rahul Luniya – complainant in c.c. no. 320 of 2011

Versus

M/s Anand Shelters Developers & Builders Pvt. Ltd. Through its Directors – opposite