SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PREM NARAIN
Punjab Gramin Bank – Appellant
Versus
Veena Kumari – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Pallav Saxena, Advocate
For the Respondent No.1:Mr. Tarunvir Singh Khehar, Advocate
For the Respondent No.2:Mr.Abhimanyu Gupta, Advocate
For the Respondent No.3 Ex-parte

ORDER

These revision petitions have been filed by the petitioner Punjab Gramin Bank against the order dated 29.04.2013 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Punjab, (in short ‘the State Commission’) passed in First Appeal Nos.1107/2012 & 1140/2012.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent No.1 & 2 are the original complainants who filed the complaint before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Hoshiarpur, (in short ‘the District Forum’) mentioning that complainant no.1 had a savings bank account in Punjab Gramin bank Ambala Jattan Hoshiarpur bearing account No.85620400085599. The complainant No.2 is the daughter of complainant No.1 and both the complainants were allotted residential plots. For the purpose of payment of allotment money i.e. Rs.3,27,500/- each, which was to be deposited before 21-01-2010, complainant no.1 applied to the appellant on 08-01-2010 for issuance of two demand drafts for Rs.3,27,500/- each from her above stated saving account in the name of Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority Greater Noida (for short

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top