SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ANUP K THAKUR
Veera Shekar – Appellant
Versus
Hemalatha – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Mr.Shilp Vinod, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr.Nandini Ram and Mr. S. Ranga Ramanujam, Advocates

ORDER

Anup K Thakur, Presiding Member—This First Appeal No.1612 of 2018 has been filed with a delay of 238 days against the impugned order of the Tamilnadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chennai (for short, ‘State Commission’) dated 20.10.2017. Vide this order, the State Commission, in C.C. No.73 of 2011 had allowed the complaint partly and directed the appellants no.1 to 3 OPs (hereinafter ‘OPs’), jointly and severally, as below

“a) to refund a sum of Rs.2500000- together with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of payment till the date of realization and

b) to pay a sum of Rs.500000- as compensation for mental agony and hardship undergone by the complainants within one month from the date of this order failing which the same shall carry interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of default till the date of realization and

c) to pay Rs.5000- as costs to the complainants.

Time for compliance one month.”

2. Instead of complying with the order of the State Commission, which by any standard was very reasonable, in the facts of the case, the OPs have chosen to file this appeal, with a delay of 238 days as per the Registry and 229 as per their app

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top