ORDER

1. Learned Counsel for the petitioner present who has drawn our attention to Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between respondent No. 1/complainant and Ashish Automobiles (A division of Somani Swiss Ind. Ltd.)-respondent No. 2, order of the District Forum dated 3.1.2000, limits of authority as per Clause 5 of dealership agreement of the petitioner with the dealer as also the subsequent judgment of the State Commission in similar matters in Maruti Udyog Ltd. v. Achutya Nand Singh and Ors., FA Nos. 286, 296, 299 301, 311 and 328 of 2007. After drawing out attention to the said documents, it was submitted by him that once the delivery of the vehicle in question had been given to the complainant, no further liability could be fastened on the petitioner specially in view of the fact that MOU was entered into between respondent Nos. 1 and 2 after the judgment of the District Forum. He also placed before us judgment of the Apex Court in Indian Oil Corporation v. Consumer Protection Council, Kerala and Anr., (1994) 2 CPJ 21 (SC), which has material bearing on the issue involved in the revision upon which reliance was placed by the State Commission in the subsequent judgment in similar