ORDER

R.C. Jain, Presiding Member - Aggrieved by the dismissal of his complaint No. 119/SC /96 by the Uttar Pradesh State Consumer Redressal Commission, Lucknow (in short, the State Commission ) vide its order dated 3.10.2005, the original complainant has filed the present appeal.

2. The facts and circumstances leading to the complaint and then the present appeal are that the complainant was admitted on 26.7.1996 to Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute, Lucknow (to be referred to as the hospital ) for the treatment of acute duodenal papillary ulcer. The ultrasonographic examination of the complainant was conducted and thereafter he was advised to undergo (contrast) CT scan on 1.8.1996. As a prelude to the said test, he was to be intravenously injected 10 ampoules of ionic contrast medium (Urograffin 76%). When, in order to inject the said dye, the nurse inserted a cannula in the left wrist of the complainant, he felt unbearable pain and cried out loudly. The nurse did not take any notice of the same; rather, she asked the complainant to remain silent. According to the complainant, when the nurse injected the first ampoule of the contrast dye through the cannula, the complainant agai