SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ASHOK BHAN, VINEETA RAI
MEERA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
ARUN KUMAR CHAUDHARY (DR. ) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate, for the Appellant; Ms. Prena Mehta, Advocate, for the Respondent

ORDER

Mrs. Vineeta Rai, Member - The present revision petition has been filed by one Meera Devi (hereinafter referred to as the Petitioner ) being aggrieved by an order of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bihar (hereinafter referred to as the 'state Commission') by which the State Commission had set aside the order of the District Forum and allowed the appeal in favour of Dr. Arun Kumar Chaudhary, Respondent No. 1 and two other doctors.

2. The facts of the case are that the late husband of the Petitioner who was the original complainant before the District forum had been admitted to Sadar Hospital, Katihar on 3.9.2003 because of a septic boil on his right thigh. According to the Petitioner, the Respondent No. 1 demanded Rs. 4,000 for getting him operated and after settling the amount at Rs. 1,000, he conducted a surgery on the right thigh near the femoral vein. After 4 to 5 hours of the operation the condition of the patient became serious and when this was brought to the notice of the Respondent, Petitioner was asked to buy one Traxol 1000 injection for immediate administration. Petitioner, therefore, purchased the injection which was injected in the vein of the dec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top