SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

R.K.BATTA, VINAY KUMAR
SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAYS – Appellant
Versus
THOLLABANDI NAGALAKSHMI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Rajeshwar Singh, Advocate, for the Appellant; None, for the Respondent

ORDER

Vinay Kumar, Member - This Revision Petition is filed before this Commission by the South Central Railways, who were OP No. 2 before the District Forum, Krishna II, Vijaywada, in a consumer complaint filed by the present Respondent No. 1. Respondent No. 2, LIC of India, in the present proceedings, was OP No. 1 before the District forum. The Revision is filed against concurrent decisions of the Fora below.

2. The case of the complainant arises from two LIC policies taken by her husband on 16.3.1998 and 21.3.1998. In both cases, OP-2 was to deduct the premia, month to month, from the salary of the assured and credit them to OP-1. The assured died on 19.7.2002 but the Complainant did not succeed in getting her claims under the policies settled till 4.5.2007 when she made the complaint to the District Forum. The reason was that seven instalments of the premium, in each case, had not been credited by OP-2 to OP-1, over a period of three years prior to the death of the assured.

3. The District Forum held OP-1 responsible for not keeping the insured informed on the default on payment of premium. OP-2 was held responsible similarly for not crediting the instalments though the policies w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top