SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ASHOK BHAN, VINEETA RAI
TARLOK CHAND KHANNA – Appellant
Versus
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Updip Singh, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. S.P. Jain, Advocate, for the Respondent

ORDER

Mrs. Vineeta Rai, Member - The present revision petition has been filed by Tarlok Chand Khanna (hereinafter referred to as the Petitioner ) being aggrieved by the order of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Punjab (hereinafter referred to as the 'state Commission') in favour of United India Insurance Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Respondent ).

2. The facts of the case, according to the Petitioner who was the original complainant before the District Forum, are that he had obtained a mediclaim insurance policy from the Respondent/Insurance Company from 1.1.2002 to 31.12.2002 for a sum of Rs. 1,50,000 for himself and his wife, Smt. Karuna Khanna. During the subsistence of this policy, Smt. Karuna Khanna suddenly developed pain in her knees. She had never suffered from any medical problems relating to her knees earlier. However, she went to the doctor who advised her to undergo surgery for knee replacement of both knees which she underwent on 15.9.2002 at a total cost of Rs. 1,78,945. Unfortunately, she died due to sudden cardiac arrest in the hospital on 29.9.2002. Requisite information regarding her admission into Nayyar Hospital, her subsequent treatmen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top