V.B.GUPTA, VINAY KUMAR
NARAYANA IIT ACADEMY – Appellant
Versus
ATISHYA JAIN – Respondent
ORDER
V.B. Gupta, Presiding Member - Present revision petition has been filed by petitioner challenging order dated 23.7.2010, passed by State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Delhi (for short as 'state Commission').
2. Vide impugned order, appeal filed by the petitioner was dismissed, being barred by limitation.
3. Brief facts are that respondents (complainants in the District Forum) filed a complaint under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short 'the Act') against petitioner (opposite party in the District Forum) on the ground that respondent No. 1 has suffered shock, trauma and mental agony due to the poor educational facilities being provided by the petitioner and as such he could not concentrate on his studies. Accordingly, respondents sought the following reliefs before the District Forum:
(i) To direct the opposite party to refund back Rs. 65,730 with interest, @ 18% per annum from the date of its receiving to the date of its realization.
(ii) To pay a sum of Rs. 1,50,000 for causing mental pain, agony, harassment of complainants, loss of invaluable study and preparation time of the complainant No. 1 to the complainant.
(iii) To impose the exemplary penal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.