V.B.GUPTA
ANNU ENTERPRISES INDIA – Appellant
Versus
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent
ORDER
V.B. Gupta, Presiding Member - Above mentioned three revision petitions arise out of common order dated 7.9.2010, passed by State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Panchkula (for short as 'state Commission'. Along with it, petitioner has filed an application for condonation of delay.
2. Brief facts are that petitioner (complainant in District Forum) was allotted plot No. 102, Pace City Sector 37, Gurgaon, vide allotment letter dated 28.6.1996 and possession of plot was delivered to him on the same day. After depositing the entire price, conveyance deed was executed in petitioner's favour. Petitioner got sanctioned the site plan for raising construction and completed construction of basement on the plot. Thereafter, petitioner filed a complaint before District Forum alleging deficiency of service on the part of the respondents, on the ground that a high tension electric line of 33 KV was passing over his plot and same has not been removed despite repeated requests.
3. Respondents case is that, at the time of delivery of possession of the plot it was disclosed to the petitioner that high tension wire was passing over the plot and same was assured to be shifted within a short
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.