ORDER

Anupam Dasgupta, Presiding Member - This revision petition challenges the order dated 21.7.2006 of the Karnataka State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bangalore (in short, the State Commission ) in Appeal No. 1823 of 2004. By this order, the State Commission allowed the appeal filed by the complainant (respondent in this revision petition), set aside the order dated 17.11.2004 of the Bangalore Urban District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bangalore (in short, the District Forum ) in complaint case No. 637 of 2004. The operative part of the State Commission's order reads as under:

"Appeal is allowed.

Impugned order is set aside.

The complaint filed by the complainant is allowed in part.

The OPs are jointly and severally liable to pay Rs. 5,000 as compensation to the complainant within two months from today.

In the event if the OPs failed to pay the amount of Rs. 5,000 within two months as directed above, the OPs are directed to pay interest at 6% per annum on the said sum of Rs. 5,000 from the date of the complaint filed before the DF till realization.

The parties are directed to bear their own costs in this appeal."

2. It is an admitted position that the respondent/compla