ORDER

R.C. Jain, Presiding Member (Oral)- Counsel for the petitioner does not dispute that the cheque issued by it to the respondent for a sum of Rs. 80,325 was not honoured but he submits that directions given in the order dated 16.3.2012 in regard to deposit of 50% of the awarded amount has already been complied with inasmuch as he has deposited Rs. 65,000, 50% of the awarded amount, in the concerned District Forum and Rs. 25,000 in the State Commission as pre-requisite for filing the appeal. In our view, at this stage no further amount was required to be paid by the petitioner to the respondent.

2. Aggrieved by the order dated 8.11.2011, passed by the UT Chandigarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (for short the State Commission ) in appeal No. 75/2011, M/s. Rimwea Career Forum Limited, opposite party before the District Forum, has approached this Commission with this petition purportedly filed under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The appeal before the State Commission was also filed by present petitioner against the order dated 7.3.2011 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, UT Chandigarh in complaint No. 423 of 2010, by which