SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.C.JAIN, ANUPAM DASGUPTA
RAJINDER SINGH DOGRA – Appellant
Versus
P. N. GUPTA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Ravi Kant Sharma, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Sagar Saxena and Mr. S.K. Rai, Advocates, for the Respondent

ORDER

Anupam Dasgupta, Member - This appeal against the order dated 27.3.2002 of the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Union Territory, Chandigarh (in short, the State Commission ) in complaint case No. 6 of 2001 has been filed by the complainant (Rajinder Singh Dogra). By this order, the State Commission dismissed the complaint holding that the complainant had failed to prove his allegations of medical negligence, carelessness and deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party (OP-Dr. P.N. Gupta) in the treatment of his wife (Smt. Reeta Dogra). For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their status before the State Commission.

2. The undisputed facts are that the complainant's wife (Reeta) suffered from abdominal pain for some time. On ultrasonography of the abdomen, she was diagnosed with stones in her gall bladder. The complainant and his wife approached the OP at his P.N. Urology and Surgical Centre (hereafter, Centre ) for consultation on this problem. The OP advised surgery and fixed it for 11.9.2000. Some necessary preliminary tests were also advised. The surgery was conducted on 11.9.2000 as scheduled and the patient was discharged the ver

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top