SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

J.M.MALIK, S.M.KANTIKAR
MONTU – Appellant
Versus
PT. BHAGWAT DAYAL SHARMA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Jawahar Narang, Advocate, for the Appellant; None, for the Respondent

ORDER

Dr. S.M. Kantikar, Member - This present Revision Petition is filed against the impugned order passed by State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (in short, State Commission), Haryana, Panchkula in First Appeal No. 770/2012 by the said order, the State Commission dismissed the appeal and set aside the orders of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum (in short, District Forum), Haryana, Rohtak passed in a Compliant Case No. 227 of 2005.

The facts in brief:

2. The Petitioner/Complainant since age of 2 years was suffering from Thalassemia major and was under the treatment of the Respondent/opposite parties Pt. Bhagwat Dayal Sharma, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana (in short PGIMS, Rohtak). The opposite parties treated the complainant by regular blood transfusion since 1991. Complainant was admitted at OPs and on 6.5.2004 he was detected as HIV +ve through ELISA test. Further it was confirmed at Dr. Lal Path Lab Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi on 26.5.2004 by Western Blot Test a confirmatory test. The grievance of the complainant was that due to the negligence of the opposite parties, HIV +ve infected blood was transfused to the omplainant and therefore

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top