ORDER

V.B. Gupta, Presiding Member - Since all the above noted appeals arise out of common order dated 26.12.2006, passed by State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (for short, 'state Commission') all these appeals are being disposed of by present common order.

2. Brief facts are that complainant - Ms. Nivedita Sharma-Complainant (Respondent No. 1 herein) filed a complaint before the State Commission on the allegations that she is a valid subscriber of the GSM mobile services provided by Bharti Tele-Ventures-Appellant No. 2/O.P. No. 1 (in F.A. No. 52 of 2012) under the brand name, Airtel. The complainant subscribed to the post-paid services provided by it since the year 2006. At the time of taking the connection a kit was provided to the complainant which inter alia included terms and conditions governing the services to be provided by Airtel to the complainant as a subscriber. It is alleged that about a year after subscribing to the post paid connection, complainant started getting calls from various banks/financial institutions and other companies for marketing their products and services. Initially such unwarranted calls were ignored; however, soon the frequency of