J.M.MALIK, S.M.KANTIKAR
VISHWANATH SHIVLING BIRAJDAR (DR. ) – Appellant
Versus
GANGADHAR SANGRAM MITKARI – Respondent
ORDER
Dr. S.M. Kantikar, Member -The Petitioner preferred the present Revision Petition against the common impugned order dated 29.9.2011 passed by the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, (in short, 'state Commission') Mumbai, Circuit Bench at Aurangabad in First Appeal Nos. 2567/2005, 2613/2005 and 101/2006 wherein the State Commission partly allowed the appeal filed by the Petitioner and directed him to pay Rs. 50,000 with 9% interest to the Complainant from 23.7.2004 till its realization.
2. Facts in brief: Ganesh, son of Complainants Sh. Gangadhar Mitkari and Smt. Kamblabai Mitkari who was suffering from piles was operated on 5.6.2003, by the petitioner/OP-1 Dr. Birajdar, at his Sanjivini Hospital, Udgir. It was alleged that OP-1, prescribed Injection Voveron for the pain, which was given by an untrained compounder. Thereafter, at 2.00 p.m. Ganesh complained about non-urination. At 6.00 p.m., as there was no movement of Ganesh, the OP-1 was called, but he did not attend. Again, at 11.00 p.m., Complainant called the OP-1 and his compounder but no avail. On 6.6.2003, early in the morning, at 6.00 a.m., the OP-1 referred the patient to Vivekanand Hospital (OP-2
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.