SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

J.M.MALIK, S.M.KANTIKAR
SUNIL GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
TODAY HOMES AND INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Arvind Bhatt and Mr. A.K. Mishra, Advocates, for the Appellant

ORDER

Mr. Justice J.M. Malik, Presiding Member -The principal controversy revolves around the question, "Whether, the complainant, Sh. Sunil Gupta, is a consumer , in this case ". This judgment shall decide two complaints which are mentioned above. Both the complaints filed by the same complainant are against the same opposite party. They entail the same questions of law. Therefore, those will be decided by a common judgment.

2. This is an admitted fact that Sh. Sunil Gupta booked two Villas, one, M-26, Opulence Villa, Mayfield Garden, Gurgaon, measuring 826.81 sq.yds. with superstructure (consisting of Ground, First and part Second Floor measuring 6,500 sq.ft. as the built-up area with front and rear courtyard) and the other, M-1, Opulence Villa, Mayfield Garden, Gurgaon, measuring 1029.75 sy.yds. (861 sq.mts.) with superstructure (consisting of Ground, First and part Second Floor measuring 6,500 sq.ft. as the built-up area with front and rear courtyard). The moot question is, Whether, a consumer can book two different Villas, while this is an admitted fact that Sh. Sunil Gupta and his family resides in a third house, bearing No. N-155, Panchshila Park, New Delhi 110 017 ". Counsel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top