AJIT BHARIHOKE, SURESH CHANDRA
HIND AUTO CENTER – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Respondent
ORDER
Mr. Suresh Chandra, Member -Petitioner/complainant firm is a dealer in the business of selling tyres of various manufacturers like MRF, Birla, J.K, Bridgestone, etc. It had insured its stock with the respondent Insurance Company/OP for the period from 21.1.2003 to 20.1.2004. In the midnight of 17/18th January, 2004, 217 tyres worth Rs. 3,83,000 were stolen from the godown of the petitioner. The petitioner lodged an FIR bearing No. 21 on 22.1.2004 with the local police station. Thereafter, the petitioner/complaint approached the respondent Insurance Company but his claim was repudiated by the Insurance Company vide its letter dated 10.12.2004 on the basis of survey report. The petitioner/complainant, therefore, filed a consumer complaint under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with the District Forum which was opposed by the OP/respondent Insurance Company by filing its reply in which it was stated that the surveyor M/s. Duggal Gupta Associates has submitted their survey report in which it has been brought out that only an attempt for theft had been made but there was no actual theft committed and as such the claim of the petitioner was repudiated by the Insurance
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.