SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

V.K.JAIN, B.C.GUPTA
JODHPUR VIKAS PRADHIKARAN, JODHPUR – Appellant
Versus
PRATAP SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ms. Madhurima Tatia, Advocate, for the Appellant

ORDER

Mr. Justice V.K. Jain, Presiding Member (Oral)- The complainant/respondent got himself registered for allotment of a plot from the petitioner Jodhpur Vikas Pradhikaran, earlier known as Urban Improvement Trust, for allotment of a plot in its Kirti Nagar Scheme. On 3.10.1998, he was informed that plot No. B-85, measuring 83.61 sq. metre had been allotted to him. He was required to deposit the price of the plot. The price of the plot was accordingly deposited by the complainant. However, the possession of the plot, was not handed over to him.

2. A notice in the newspaper was published by the petitioner on 25.5.2002, informing the allottees of plots in various schemes that they should submit their representation with respect to possession having not been given to them, along with documents if available, within a period of 15 days from the publication of the notice. It was further stated in the said notice that those who had deposited the prescribed registration fee at the time of allotment but were not allotted the plots and had not taken refund, could also submit their claim along with evidence. In response to the aforesaid notice, the complainant submitted a representation to th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top