SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

V.B.GUPTA
SIDDHARTHA DE SIKDAR – Appellant
Versus
RAMESH CHANDRA BASAK – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P. Pankaj, Advocate, for the Appellant; None for the Respondents, for the Respondent

ORDER

V.B. Gupta, (P.M) - Present revision petition has been filed under Section 21(b) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short, Act) challenging order dated 9.9.2014 passed by State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, West Bengal, Kolkata (for State Commission) in F.A. No.265 of 2013.

2. Brief facts are that Respondent No.1/Complainant entered into an agreement with the Petitioners on 25.11.1998 for purchase of flat No.B/2 measuring about 650 sq. ft. on the second floor of the building for a consideration of Rs. 4,50,000/- and paid Rs. 3,40,000/-. It is stated that possession of the flat was handed over to him on 09-10-2001. During the proceedings, one of the said owners, Shri Shib Kinkar Dey Sikdar, died intestate on 14.11.2002 leaving behind Siddharth Dey Sikdar and Mina Dey Sikdar, Petitioners no.1 and 2. It is alleged by respondent no.1, that he requested the petitioners and other respondents to execute and register the deed of conveyance on receiving the balance money. Accordingly, he prepared the deed of conveyance alongwith the stamp papers but without assigning any reason, they neglected and refused to execute the deed of conveyance. Hence, this case.

3. Before the D

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top