SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

J.M.MALIK, S.M.KANTIKAR
SALAM TULLAH – Appellant
Versus
LAL BAHADUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ms. Meenakshi Singhal, Advocate, for the Appellant

ORDER

Dr. S.M. Kantikar, Member - The brief facts relevant in both the revision petitions are these. Shri. Shiv Dhan's wife Nagina and daughter Sonkeshi and Shri. Lal Bahadur's mother Surshati were treated for gastro by Dr. Kazi, alias Salamatullah (the OP). The OP continuously gave Glucose to all the three patients when, on the night falling between 6/7 September, 1998, all three of them passed away. Alleging that it was negligence and deficiency in the medical treatment by Dr. Kazi, both the complainants, Shri. Shiv Dhan and Shri Lal Bahadur filed two separate complaints bearing complaint No. 381 of 1998 and Complaint No. 382 of 1998, respectively, against Dr. Kazi Salamatullah (the OP) before District Forum, Kushi Nagar (UP). The complainants also filed a criminal case under Section 304-A/323 I.P.C against OP.

2. Dr. Kazi submitted before the District Forum that there was an argument between the doctor and Shiv Dhan, as Shiv Dhan had taken the bicycle of the doctor. The opposite party has not supported his reply/objections with any affidavit.

3. The District Forum relying on the assertion of complainant, held that Dr. Kazi was a Jhola Chhap doctor, without any valid medical degre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top