SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

V.B.GUPTA, SURESH CHANDRA
KUMARI MAHUA DARIPA – Appellant
Versus
ANIRUDDHA GHORAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.N. Mittal, Advocate, for the Appellant; Prabir Basu & Sanjay Kumar Ghosh, Advocates, for the Respondent

ORDER

Suresh Chandra, Member - The appellant has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 1.3.2007 passed by the West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in SC Case No.70/O/2001 whereby the State Commission has dismissed the complaint filed by the appellant against the respondent who was OP before the State Commission.

2. The factual matrix of this case are that the complaint under section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 was filed by the appellant against the respondent and 2 others. Subsequently, the names of other two OPs were deleted vide State Commissions order dated 3.8.2005. As per the averments in the complaint, the complainant fell down from the roof of her house on 23.5.2000 and suffered haemorrhage in her brain. She was admitted in CMRI, Kolkata and was released on 6.6.2000. On 11.6.2000, she was taken to her native village from Kolkata and on 14.6.2000 she got fever with temperature rising to 102O F. Thereupon, one Dr. Somnath Roy examined her on 15.6.2000 at her residence and he advised urine test and prescribed Cifram-500. It is alleged that she swallowed the tablet but could not tolerate its effect because she was allergic to such a medicin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top