SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

AJIT BHARIHOKE, REKHA GUPTA
GYANI – Appellant
Versus
JILA SAHAKARI KRISHI & GRAMEEN VIKAS BANK LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mohd Anis Ur Rahman, Advocate, for the Appellant

ORDER

Rekha Gupta, Member. - Revision Petition no. 3708 of 2012 has been filed against the order dated 23.07.2012 of the Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Raipur ('the State Commission') in Appeal no. 12 of 2012.

2. The facts of the case as per the petitioner/complainant are that on 23.05.2002 a loan of Rs. 3,42,000/- was granted by the Respondent/opposite party Surguja District Cooperative Agriculture and Rural Development Bank, to the petitioner/complainant for the purpose of purchase of tractor, trolley, case wheel and cultivator. The said loan was to be repaid in a period of 9 years and the annual instalments were of Rs. 67,893/-, which was payable up to 31st January every year. It was also not in dispute that the petitioner paid Rs. 87,346/- as down payment for the purchase of tractor and trolley bearing Nos. CG-15-A-0954 and CG-15-A-0956, respectively along with case-wheel and cultivator. The said tractor and trolley were seized by the respondent on 31.03.2006 and thereafter were returned to the petitioner on 11.02.2006, when the petitioner deposited Rs. 25,000/- with the appellant Bank. On 15.05.2006, again the tractor and trolley were seized and were

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top