SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

V.K.JAIN, B.C.GUPTA
SHEO MUNI PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
NORTHERN RAILWAY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Manish Shanker Srivastava, Advocate, for the Appellant; None for the Respondents, for the Respondent

ORDER

V.K. Jain, (P.M) - The complainant retired from the services of the Indian Railways. The case of the complainant is that at the time of his retirement, an amount of Rs. 4,64,410/- was deducted illegally from his gratuity fund. Being aggrieved from the aforesaid deduction, he approached the concerned District Forum by way of a complaint seeking return of the aforesaid amount along-with interest and compensation.

2. The complaint was resisted by the respondent on the ground that the complainant having illegally retained the official accommodation allotted to him, the aforesaid amount was deducted on account of the demurrage rent payable by him.

3. The District Forum vide its order dated 05.09.2014, directed the opposite party to pay a sum of Rs. 4,64,410/- to the complainant.

4. Being aggrieved from the aforesaid order, respondents preferred an appeal before the concerned State Commission. Vide impugned order dated 31.08.2015, the State Commission set aside the order passed by the District Forum. Being aggrieved, complainant is before us by way of this revision petition.

5. We find from a perusal of the reply filed by the respondents before the District Forum that one of the obj

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top