SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

K.S.CHAUDHARI
SKODA AUTO INDIA P LTD. – Appellant
Versus
BHAWESH NARULA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vipin Singhania, Advocate, for the Appellant; Dushyant Parashar, Advocate, for the Respondent

ORDER

K.S. Chaudhari, (P.M) - This revision petition has been filed by the petitioners against the order dated 10.03.2014 passed by the Uttarakhand State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Dehradun (in short, the State Commission) in Appeal No. 127 of 2011 - M/s. Skoda Auto India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. Sh. Bhawesh Narula by which, while dismissing appeal, order of District forum allowing complaint was upheld.

2. Brief facts of the case are that Complainant/respondent purchased Skoda Fabia diesel car from OP No. 2 / Petitioner No. 2 on 14.10.2009 for a sum of Rs. 6,35,950/- which was manufactured by OP No. 1/Petitioner No. 1. On 17.05.2010. When complainant was in Dehradun, the vehicle had pick-up problem which was brought to the notice of the opposite party No. 2. The complainant was told that the vehicle requires servicing. The Service Manager of the opposite party No. 2 told the complainant that all the filters of the vehicle including the diesel filter needs to be replaced. The diesel filter is required to be replaced only after the vehicle had run 30,000 kms. The complainant agreed for change of the filters. The vehicle was repaired by the opposite party No. 2 the same day and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top